Tuesday, July 15, 2008

Shawkit zert



Gillian's vocabulary is growing by leaps and bounds.  Pretty much every day she surprises me with new words, things that I didn't realize she knows.  The new one from this weekend was "band-aid."  That one was a direct result of her exerting her independence and trying to pull out one of the kitchen chairs without any help...  I'm also quickly discovering that the second child experiences some things much earlier than the first.  I'm sure some of that is because I'm not as cautious with Gillian as I was with Brianna.  Or maybe it's just because I'm too tired to put up a fight a lot of the time... =)  

The intersection of these two things is that the word "shawkit" was a very early addition to Gillian's vocabulary.  Brianna is a fan of all things chocolate, and Gillian seems to be following in her footsteps.  More recently, I had to decipher "zert" which when put into context turned out to be "dessert."  If Brianna asks for dessert, Gillian wants some too.  Now.  The funny thing is that once she's had some "zert" she'll quite happily go back and finish the rest of her dinner if she wasn't done with it.  

I'm sure you can all guess that this week's Tuesdays with Dorie selection was very popular around here.  While I seldom make anything out of a box, there is often instant chocolate pudding mix in my pantry because Brianna gets such a kick out of "making" it.  So she was absolutely thrilled that I was making chocolate pudding this week.  



The actually making of it was...interesting.  I can't remember the last time a seemingly simple dessert dirtied so many dishes in my kitchen.  =)  Dorie recommends using the food processor for a lot of the steps in this recipe.  Next time, I'm going to pass on that.  All was well as I pulsed the eggs and sugar and added the dry ingredients.  But when it came to adding the hot milk, things got messy.  While I was carefully watching to make sure I didn't exceed the quantity of liquid that my processor can handle, I didn't count on there being a ton of foam.  And things sloshed around enough that I was really afraid that the liquid was going to leak out the middle.  

Once I poured the whole mess back into my saucepan, I cooked it until it thickened and the foam subsided.  I dirtied a few more dishes by pouring the thickened mixture through a fine-mesh strainer into another bowl (it may not have needed it, but I like to make sure there aren't any lumps or bits of egg).  Then I whisked in the melted chocolate, butter and vanilla.  I ladled the finished pudding into ramekins--four 4-ounce and four 3-ounce.  Brianna was quite disappointed that the smaller ones were for her and Gillian.  =)  

The verdict?  Jamie said that the first thing he thought of was "creamy."  Gillian and Brianna quickly polished off their portions.  I thought it was pretty tasty, but I think the chocolate pots de creme from Cook's Illustrated are still my favorite (a post for another time).  I can definitely see myself making this again, though without the food processor.

Thanks to Melissa of It's Melissa's Kitchen for a great selection this week.  Check out her blog for the recipe, or look here on Dorie's blog.  And don't forget to check out the other TWD blogs! 

24 comments:

  1. I'm going to try the hand blender next time...but I thought I should do it Dorie's way this time since I picked the recipe!

    ReplyDelete
  2. I enjoyed the post. I agree with you about the 2nd child...they definitely experience things earlier. I just think they want to do everything #1 is doing...and then some! Your pudding looks so creamy. Mine was very good, but didn't seem quite as creamy.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Looks decadent...although if you say there's a Cook's Illustrated recipe out there that tops this, I might have to try it...

    ReplyDelete
  4. Your kids sound absolutely adorable! Shawkit zert - I just started laughing out loud!

    ReplyDelete
  5. Oh, these kids are going to be ruined for Jell-O. ;)

    ReplyDelete
  6. Shawkit zert! I love that!!

    ReplyDelete
  7. I agree about the second child, it has alway a model (?) who teaches all these "useful" things ;-)

    And I agree with the foodprocessor thing, glad I don't own one.

    No, chocolate on the table? I am impressed...

    Ulrike from Küchenlatein

    ReplyDelete
  8. hee hee so funny on the so many dirty pots, i just did the one bowl whisk method and it worked wonderfully. this is a GREAT pudding recipe so now i am looking fwd to reading about your fave pot de creme.

    ReplyDelete
  9. love the post title ;) so cute. the pudding looks delicious!

    ReplyDelete
  10. That is the cutest little title - and I love that you can decipher it!! My 10 month old says Yum Yum for all things food - just louder when it is something he loves! Your pudding looks deish...

    ReplyDelete
  11. Band aid is a favorite word in my house! I thought that this dessert was rich and creamy but I will pass on the food processor next time! Love the title and your pudding looks delicious!

    ReplyDelete
  12. That is seriously cute! My five year old still says "garbarage" and it's so cute I haven't tried to correct him yet. Great job on your pudding!

    ReplyDelete
  13. I'm with Gillian and Brianna. Bring on Dorie's shawkit zert!

    ReplyDelete
  14. What a sweetiepie. I want some more shawkit zert myself.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Your shawkit zert looks gorgeous! And so is your little girl! How cute!

    ReplyDelete
  16. Your pictures are fabulous! Glad everyone enjoyed it.

    ReplyDelete
  17. I was surprised, too, at how dirty the kitchen was after the pudding! Yours looks delicious, though, and your girls are so pretty!

    ReplyDelete
  18. I totally agree with you that a second child experiences a lot of things much quicker than the first. And with the third, well, it all just goes to heck! :)

    Your pudding looks fabulous, it's nice everyone enjoyed it.

    ReplyDelete
  19. I'm very impressed with your girls' vocabulary! ;-)

    ReplyDelete
  20. Your daughter looks so cute in that last picture!

    I had the same trouble with the food processor and adding milk. I had to do it in two seperate batches. Glad to see I wasn't the only one! I'm interested in trying the Cook's Illustrated recipe you wrote about. If it's better than this pudding, it must be pretty darn good! :-) TFS!

    ReplyDelete
  21. Now that pudding looks like it was enjoyed. :-)

    ReplyDelete
  22. zert - that is so cute! looks great!

    ReplyDelete